English
Received 17.06.2024, Revised 17.10.2024, Accepted 25.11.2024
In the contemporary world, armed conflicts pose a threat not only to human lives, but also to cultural heritage, which serves as crucial evidence of the history and identity of nations. Research into the potential of blockchain technology draws attention to its capabilities in preserving evidence of cultural heritage and crimes committed against it during military conflicts, particularly in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. This study aimed to analyse the use of blockchain technology for documenting crimes against cultural heritage, focusing on its potential for long-term preservation, authentication of digital evidence, ensuring open access to records, and supporting digital memory at a national level. The research methodology combined general scientific methods – analysis, synthesis, abstraction, logical exposition, and generalisation – with specialised research methods, including bibliographic analysis, content analysis, and critical approaches. Blockchain is a distributed ledger (or database) composed of a chain of blocks, each containing specific information. The potential of blockchain technology can be harnessed to document crimes against cultural heritage, particularly in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. This involved: preserving digital evidence of crimes, creating a register of lost heritage, decentralising archival data, securing international recognition of facts of criminal destruction, and facilitating crowdfunding and funding for restoration. Existing blockchain initiatives, such as Salsal, Monuverse, and Ukraine DAO, by transforming cultural heritage into an interactive digital resource, can become tools for documenting criminal damage, preserving memory, countering illicit trafficking of artefacts, and establishing a novel form of resilient digital documentation in wartime. The practical significance of the research lies in the use of blockchain for preserving the heritage of Ukraine and other countries experiencing cultural losses due to war. This is crucial for ensuring digital memory, transparency, and the legal reliability of information for subsequent legal prosecution and historical accountability for crimes against heritage in Ukraine
digital preservation of evidence; protection of cultural property; digital technologies; international documentation standards; data decentralisation
[1] Blockchain in cultural heritage. Blockchain technology applications for authentication, traceability and management of digital cultural heritage rights. (n.d.). Flashcards World. Retrieved from https://flashcards.world/flashcards/sets/26e75948-38c5-46d2-a164-eddbafd5b78e/.
[2] Boiko, V., & Maksymov, S. (2023). NFT as leading tool of art in representation of visual environment. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 1, 152-156. doi: 10.32461/2226-3209.1.2023.277651.
[3] Buragohain, D., Meng, Y., Deng, C., Li, Q., & Chaudhary, S. (2024). Digitalizing cultural heritage through metaverse applications: Challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Heritage Science, 12, article number 295. doi: 10.1186/s40494-024-01403-1.
[4] Burkey, B. (2021). From bricks to clicks: How digital heritage initiatives create a new ecosystem for cultural heritage and collective remembering. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 46(2), 185-205. doi: 10.1177/01968599211041112.
[5] Bustos Pretel, G. (2018). The archive in the blockchain era. GTT. Retrieved from https://www.gtt.es/boletinjuridico/el-archivo-en-la-era-blockchain/.
[6] de Regt, H.W. (2020). Understanding, values, and the aims of science. Philosophy of Science, 87(5), 921-932. doi: 10.1086/710520.
[7] De Santo, M., Niccolucci, F., & Richards, J. (2017). Editorial: Special issue on digital infrastructures for cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 10(1), article number 1ee. doi: 10.1145/3047266.
[8] Ishchenko, K. (2024). NFT as a current component of modern cultural and art space. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 1, 266-272. doi: 10.32461/2226-3209.1.2024.302079.
[9] Khelifi, A., Altaweel, М., Hashir, М. Hadjitofi, Т., & Ghazal, М. (2024). Salsal: Blockchain for vetting cultural object collections. Heritage Science, 12, article number 15. doi: 10.1186/s40494-023-01129-6.
[10] Kostina, Е. (2022). On Monuverse, cultural monuments meet the metaverse. Jing Daily Culture. Retrieved from https://jingdailyculture.com/monuverse-arch-of-peace-ouchhh-nfts-vr/.
[11] Kravchenko, A. (2023). Art blockchain in cultural and artistic practices of the 21st century. Humanities Studies. Current Issues, 2(62), 37-43. doi: 10.24919/2308-4863/62-2-6.
[12] Krestyanpol, L., Novachevskyi, S., & Hranovskyi, M. (2023). Application of blockchain technologies for preservation and dissemination of cultural heritage through NFT. Information Technology and Society, 3, 54-62. doi: 10.32689/maup.it.2023.3.7.
[13] Liddell, F. (2021). Building shared guardianship through blockchain technology and digital museum objects. Museum & Society, 19(2), 220-236. doi: 10.29311/mas.v19i2.3495.
[14] Lvping, S. (2021). Blockchain technology for management of intangible cultural heritage. Scientific Programming, 2021, article number 2613656. doi: 10.1155/2021/2613656.
[15] Machado, S. (2016). MIT researcher uses blockchain to preserve cultural monuments. Criptonoticias. Retrieved from https://www.criptonoticias.com/comunidad/investigador-mit-utiliza-blockchain-preservar-monumentos-culturales/.
[16] Machulin, L. (2022). The impact of nonfungible tokens (NFT) on the art world. Culture of Ukraine, 75, 67-77. doi: 10.31516/2410-5325.075.09.
[17] Oliynyk, V. (2024). X discusses Ukraine DAO organisation – what happened. Ain. Retrieved from https://ain.ua/2024/03/04/fond-ukraine-dao-shho-stalosya/.
[18] Project Dokaz – the Starling Lab (Stanford + USC). (n.d.) Retrieved from https://ukraine-dao.notion.site/Project-Dokaz-the-Starling-Lab-Stanford-USC-838971249d224ce39d4c9232aadc64e4.
[19] Spodenets, I., & Zhukova, O. (2022). Blockchain technology for creating NFT-tokens – as a sphere of actualization of monuments of fortification architecture. Fortifications, 17, 22-28. doi: 10.23939/fortifications2022.17.022.
[20] Stublić, H., Bilogrivić, M., & Zlodi, G. (2023). Blockchain and NFTs in the cultural heritage domain: A review of current research topics. Heritage, 6(4), 3801-3819. doi: 10.3390/heritage6040202.
[21] Ukraine DAO. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://linktr.ee/ukrainedao.
[22] Valeonti, F., Bikakis, A., Terras, M., Speed, C., Hudson-Smith, A., & Chalkias, K. (2021). Crypto collectibles, museum funding and OpenGLAM: Challenges, opportunities and the potential of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Applied Sciences, 11(21), article number 9931. doi: 10.3390/app11219931.
[23] Wang, Y.-C., Chen, C.-L., & Deng Y.-Y. (2021). Museum-authorization of digital rights: A sustainable and traceable cultural relics exhibition mechanism. Sustainability, 13(4), article number 2046. doi: 10.3390/su13042046.
[24] Yastikli, N. (2007). Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 8(4), 423-427. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2007.06.003.
[25] Zhang, J., Guo, M., Li, B., & Lu, R. (2021). A transport monitoring system for cultural relics protection based on blockchain and internet of things. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 50, 106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2021.05.007.
[26] Zhao, L., Zhang, J., Jing, H., Wu, J., & Huang, Y. (2023). A blockchain-based cryptographic interaction method of digital museum collections. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 59, 69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2022.11.001.
[27] Zoannos, N., Chourdaki, P., & Assimakopoulos, N. (2023). Can UNESCO use blockchain to ensure the intangible cultural heritage of humanity? A systemic approach that explains the why, how, and difficulties of such a venture. Heritage, 6(3), 3232-3255. doi: 10.3390/heritage6030171.
Українська