Received 19.09.2022, Revised 22.11.2022, Accepted 26.12.2022
The purpose of the article is to characterise the features of fake news as a new means of propaganda, disinformation, and manipulation. The research methodology is based on the interdisciplinary integration of methodological tools of a number of approaches, taking into account the principles of objectivity, systematicity, and reliability. The system method has been used to analyse fake news as a complex-structured communication system; as a socio-communicative phenomenon within social networks – functional; as the newest form of rumor – comparative. In addition, the research methodology is based on general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, generalisation, and systematisation. Scientific novelty consists in improving the scientific conceptualisation of the concept of fake news as a new means of manipulation, disinformation, and propaganda. Conclusions. Fake is false news, invented stories for the purpose of obtaining any benefit (financial, political, or other), the authenticity of which is provided by fabricated media formats: text message, advertisement, photo, video or audio fakes, use of bots, trolls who actively participate in discussions. Types of fakes include outright misinformation, manipulation, propaganda, rumors, memes, alternative facts, "viral" content, pranking, news satire, generators of news, and synthesised media content. Social networks play the biggest role in spreading fake information. Currently, the issues of forming critical thinking skills and information literacy of the population, conducting campaigns to form a strategy against fake news, to prevent the risk of losing trust in democracy and Internet technologies, as well as to resist the manipulation of public opinion, are becoming actualised
fake; deepfake; false information; social networks; manipulation; Internet communication
[1] Vilchynska, I. (2021). False information as a means of manipulative interaction. In Information education and professional communication technologies of the 21st century: Materials of the 12th international scientific and practical conference (pp. 105-108). Odesa.
[2] Kitsa, M. (2016). Fake information in Ukrainian social media: Concepts, types, influence on the audience. Social Communications, 281-287
[3] Mudra, I. (2016). The concept of "fake" and its types in mass media. TV and Radio Journalism, 15, 184-188.
[4] Ahmed, S. (2021). Who inadvertently shares deepfakes? Analyzing the role of political interest, cognitive ability, and social network size. Telematics and Informatics, 57. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101508.
[5] Cole, S. (2020). New deepfake method can put words in anyone’s mouth. Vice.
[6] Durodolu, O.O., Chisita, C., & Dube, T.V. (2021). Flattening the curve of fake news in the epoch of infodemic: An epistemic challenge. In Deep fakes, fake news, and misinformation in online teaching and learning technologies (pp.143-161). University of South Africa. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-6474-5.ch007.
[7] Jackson, L., & Valentine, G. (2014). Emotion and politics in a mediated public sphere: Questioning democracy, responsibility and ethics in a computer mediated world. Geoforum, 52, 193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.008.
[8] Kapferer, J.-N. (1987). Rumeur, le plus vieux média en ligne. Seuil.
[9] Knapp, R.H. (1944). A psychology of rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly, 8, 22-37.
[10] Knight, W. (2019). An AI that writes convincing prose risks mass-producing fake news. MIT Technology Review.
[11] Molina, M.D., Sundar, S.S., Le, T., & Lee, D. (2021). "Fake News" is not simply false information: A concept explication and taxonomy of online content. doi: 10.1177/0002764219878224.
[12] Meng, J. (2019). China issues new rules to clamp down on deepfake technologies used to create and broadcast fake news. South China Morning Post.
[13] Shibutani, T. (1966). Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor. Indianapolis, N.Y.