Українська
Verkhovtseva, I.
(2024).
Ukraine’s cyberdiplomacy in countering Russian information aggression.
Library Science. Record Studies. Informology,
20(3),
21-31.
https://doi.org/10.63009/lsrsi/3.2024.21
ISSN 2409-9805
English
Article
Ukraine’s cyberdiplomacy in countering Russian information aggression
Received 29.04.2024, Revised 30.07.2024, Accepted 28.08.2024
Abstract
Ukraine’s counteraction to Russia’s information aggression in the international arena after its intervention in 2014 in Donetsk, Luhansk, and Crimea to discredit everything Ukrainian requires the search for effective tools, considering the intensification of processes in cyberspace and the globalisation of communications. The purpose of this study was to prove that one of the effective tools for Ukraine’s counteraction to Russian information aggression of an anti-Ukrainian nature in international communications is cyberdiplomacy in its public diplomatic format. The research methodology included a set of general scientific methods (logic, induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis) and specialised methods, such as structural-functional, typological, narrative, and generalisation methods. Since the 1980s, the revolution of information and communication technologies and the cyberneticisation of the global information field have been shaping a new reality – cyberspace. As a communication medium in public diplomatic practices, it substantially affects the communication of governments with the public of foreign countries to influence foreign governments by promoting national ideas, values, institutions, culture, and policies in the information field of the target audience, which affects the image of the state through its perception by the foreign public. In this context, the aggressive policy of the Russian Federation, based on the achievements of the information age, demonstrated how authoritarian countries manipulate people’s minds and form beliefs that are favourable to them. Specifically, anti-Ukrainian information activities and the spread of false narratives around the world create a negative image of Ukraine to undermine its international authority and slow down Western assistance to it. Ukraine should actively counter these hostile narratives within the international cyberspace, with cyberdiplomacy in its public diplomatic format being an effective tool, and public/people’s diplomacy involving scientists, politicians, students, and the public as one of the instruments, as well as the creation of multichannel media platforms that will host relevant information and educational content with open access to foreign recipients in their languages. In terms of practical value, the findings of this study will serve to develop optimised models of Ukrainian cyberdiplomacy
Keywords:
Russian information warfare; diplomacy; public diplomacy; communications in cyberspace; public/ people’s diplomacy
- 533 Views
- Read article
References
[1] Alekseenko, I.V. (2022). Public diplomacy in globalization conditions: New challenges. Public Administration: Improvement and Development, 12. doi: 10.32702/2307-2156.2022.12.2.
[2] Al-Muftah, H., Weerakkody, V., Rana, N.P., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2018). Factors influencing e-diplomacy implementation: Exploring causal relationships using interpretive structural modelling. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 502-514. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.002.
[3] At Lviv University, we talked about digital diplomacy. (2023). Information and analytics agency “Gal-info”. Retrieved from https://galinfo.com.ua/news/u_lvivskomu_universyteti_rozmovlyaly_pro_tsyfrovu_dyplomatiyu_409777.html.
[4] Barrinha, A., & Renard, T. (2017). Cyber-diplomacy: The making of an international society in the digital age. Global Affairs, 3(4-5), 353-364. doi: 10.1080/23340460.2017.1414924.
[5] Bortniak, V., Drozd, O., Zhuravlyov, D., Kopotun, I., Koropatnik, I., Pietkov, V., Pietkov, S., Siedykh, Yu., & Sharashenidze, A. (2022). People’s diplomacy during the war in Ukraine. History, current state, main directions of implementation, real examples. Kyiv: Professional Publishing House.
[6] Constitution of Ukraine. (1996, June). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution.
[7] Danilyan, O., & Dzoban, O. (2022). Information war in the media space of modern society. Bulletin of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. Series: Philosophy, Philosophy of Law, Political Science, Sociology, 3(54), 11-29. doi: 10.21564/2663-5704.54.265589.
[8] Decree of the of the President of Ukraine No. 685/2021 “On the Decision of the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine of 15 October 2021 “On the Information Security Strategy”. (2021, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/685/2021#Text.
[9] Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 447/2021 “On the Decision of the National Security” and Defence Council of Ukraine “On the Cybersecurity Strategy of Ukraine”. (2021, May). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/4472021-40013.
[10] Demianenko, M. (2018). Countering information aggression: World experience and domestic realities. Scientific Works of the Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, 50, 225-240. doi: 10.15407/np.50.225.
[11] Deputy Minister: MFA is developing Ukraine’s cyber diplomacy strategy. (2024). UkrInform. Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/3863944-mzs-rozroblae-strategiu-kiberdiplomatii-ukraini-zastupnik-ministra.html.
[12] Draft Council Conclusions on Cyber Diplomacy 6122/15. (2015, February). Council of the European Union. Retrieved from https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6122-2015-INIT/en/pdf.
[13] Dubov, D. (2014). Cyberspace as a new dimension of geopolitical rivalry. Kyiv: NISS.
[14] Dzerkal, V. (2023). Tools of cyber diplomacy in the implementation of the state’s foreign policy. In Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference. Actual problems of modern international relations (pp. 198-200). Dnipro: PrintDim.
[15] Dzhus, O. (2022). Conceptual foundations of information war in the modern conditions of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Politology Bulletin, 88, 189-201. doi: 10.17721/2415-881x.2022.88.189-201.
[16] Holovko, I. (2022). New public diplomacy in the modern scientific discourse. Philosophy and Political Science in the Context of Modern Culture, 14(2), 102-109. doi: 10.15421/352228.
[17] Ilnytskyj, V., Starka, V., & Haliv, M. (2022). Russian propaganda as an element of preparation for armed aggression against Ukraine. Ukrainian Historical Journal, 5, 43-55. doi: 10.15407/uhj2022.05.043.
[18] Komar, O. (2022). Soft power and propaganda in the Russian-Ukrainian war: Epistemological analysis. Ukrainian Almanac, 30, 82-88. doi: 10.17721/2520-2626/2022.30.11.
[19] Kovalskyi, S. (2023). Countering Russian disinformation and propaganda in the Ukrainian information space (on the example of the electronic resource of the Center for Countering Disinformation at the NSDC of Ukraine). Dialogue Media Studios, 29, 96-108. doi: 10.18524/2308-3255.2023.29.300638.
[20] Kukalets, O. (2020). Public diplomacy in the theory of international relations. Scientific Notes of Students and Postgraduates Series “International Relations”, 5, 141-147.
[21] Law of Ukraine No. 2163-VII “On the Basic Principles of Ensuring Cybersecurity of Ukraine”. (2024, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2163-19#Text.
[22] Lukianchikova, V.Y. (2013). Cyberspace: Threats to international relations and global security. Gilea: Scientific Bulletin, 72, 793-796.
[23] Marushchak, A.I. (2022). Prerequisites for the formation of legal mechanisms for countering disinformation in social media in the context of national security: Problem statement. Information And Law, 1, 82-88.
[24] Matviienko, V., & Petushkova, G. (2024). Cyber diplomacy in the European Union: The Estonian model of cyber diplomacy and Ukraine’s experience. Diplomatic Ukraine, 24, 696-708. doi: 10.37837/2707-7683-2023-37.
[25] Mikhailovsky, R.A., & Budur, I.M. (2023). The geopolitical dimension of information confrontation. In Materals of scientific seminar of the Kharkiv National University of the Air Force named after Ivan Kozhedub “Information confrontation in the conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian war” (рр. 127-132). Kharkiv: KhNUAF named after I. Kozhedub.
[26] NATO Deputy Secretary General 2019-2024. (2024). North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/who_is_who_167942.htm.
[27] One billion dollars for the war of meaning. The enemy aims at our identity. (2023). Hromada.Group. Retrieved from https://Gromada.Group/News/Statti/Milyard-Dolariv-Na-Smislovu-Vijnu-Vorog-Cilit-U-Nashu-Identichnist.
[28] Oxford English Dictionary. (2024). Public diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/dictionary/public-diplomacy_n?tab=factsheet#27764860100.
[29] Pasichna, V. (2023). Cyberdiplomacy and its impact on the information society. In Proceedings of the international scientific conference “Digital diplomacy of Ukraine: Synergy of real and virtual" (рр. 79-81). Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.
[30] Piddubna, L. (2016). Cyberspace as a socio-cultural factor of the network society. Gilea: Scientific Bulletin, 105, 204-207.
[31] Pronoza, I. (2020). Mass media and communication in the information war as a modern political practice. Politikus, 3, 65-69.
[32] Public Diplomacy Strategy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine for 2021-2025. (2021). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://mfa.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/%D0%A1%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D1%96%D1%97/public-diplomacy-strategy.pdf.
[33] Romtsiv, O., & Kharchenko, A. (2023). Methods of Russian information propaganda and their impact on the image of Ukraine in the world. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 5, 190-193. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2023.05.32.
[34] Savchuk, A. (2015). Peter Pomerantsev: The goal of Russian propaganda is that no one should trust anyone. Ukrainian Truth. Retrieved from http://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2015/03/31/7063251/.
[35] Sukhorolska, I. (2022). Public diplomacy in contemporary international relations: New trends and features. Regional Studios, 30, 103-107. doi: 10.32782/2663-6170/2022.30.17.
[36] Sukhorolska, I., & Klymchuk, I. (2022). Public diplomacy under the conditions of Russia’s aggressive war against Ukraine. Bulletin of Lviv University. Serie “Philosophical and Political Studies”, 43, 322-331. doi: 10.30970/PPS.2022.43.39.
[37] Sunhurova, S. (2022). International experience in combating political violence through information warfare. Politology Bulletin, 88, 202-218. doi: 10.17721/2415–88ІX.2022.88.202-218.
[38] Sviderska, O. (2022). Digital propaganda and information security risks in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. Politikus, 2, 60-65. doi: 10.24195/2414- 9616.2022-2.10.
[39] Tarasiuk, A. (2019). Correlation of information and cyber security. Information and Law, 4, 73-82. doi: 10.37750/2616-6798.2019.4(31).194721.
[40] Trofymenko, M.V. (2023). Transformation of public diplomacy in the context of globalisation and digitalisation: Methodological principles and practical aspects (Ukrainian case). Bulletin of Mariupol State University. Series: History. Political Science, 35-36, 141-154. doi: 10.34079/2226-2830-2023-13-35-36-141-154.
[41] Tsivaty, V. (2023). Digital diplomacy of Ukraine: Innovative, security and international political discourses (synergy of real and virtual). In Proceedings of the international scientific conference “Digital diplomacy of Ukraine: Synergy of real and virtual" (pp. 108-112). Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.
[42] Ukraine is offered cyberdiplomacy. (2024). ZN,UA. Retrieved from https://zn.ua/ukr/UKRAINE/ukrajini-proponujut-kiberdiplomatiju.html.
[43] Vashchenko, N. (2020). The main narratives of Russian propoganda as impact-generating issues in terms of consciental war of Russia against Ukraine. Scientific Notes of Institute of Journalism, 1, 180-201. doi: 10.17721/2522-1272.2020.76.15.
[44] Verkhovtseva, І. (2023). Cooperation of local self-government bodies of Ukraine with European partners under conditions of war 2022-2023: Public-diplomatic dimension (organizational-legal aspects). In New agenda for Europe and the European Union: Reasons - directions - priority goals (pp. 18-26). Lviv-Olshtyn: Publishing House of Lviv Polytechnic.
[45] Yakovenko, N., & Piskorska, G. (2018). Transformation of NATO public diplomacy. American History and Politics, 5, 197-206. doi: 10.17721/2521-1706.2018.05.197-206.
[46] Yemets, V. (2023). Public diplomacy as a tool for forming image of Ukraine in the condition of full-scale war. Bulletin of Lviv University. Philosophical and Political Studies, 46, 291-296. doi: 10.30970/PPS.2023.46.36.
[47] Zelenko, H. (Ed.). (2024). Fake Russia: Imitation of greatness and power. Nizhyn: Lysenko MM.